- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:16:02 +0100
- To: G. Wade Johnson <gwadej@anomaly.org>
- Cc: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, www-svg@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
On Mar 18, 2009, at 12:48 , G. Wade Johnson wrote:
> Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:
> Why would it? Unlike HTML, SVG is _defined_ to be XML and the above is
> not well-formed.
>
> That seems to be a large part of the disagreement.
As explained several times before in these threads, it is _currently_
defined to be XML. But there is no reason to be married to that.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 12:16:39 UTC