- From: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:30:10 +0000
- To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Cc: www-svg List <www-svg@w3.org>
David, you're making the erroneous assumption that there's support for html. in many cases there isn't. it's apparent that XForms is not currently available and hence as described, it seems the user will require an action with method as a minimum to communicate. regards Jonathan Chetwynd j.chetwynd@btinternet.com http://www.peepo.com/ +44 (0) 20 7978 1764 On 17 Mar 2008, at 18:15, David Woolley wrote: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote: > which is simple to understand does not provide anything similar to: > html form: action or method, which aywk do not require script. > and it is in this sense that I feel the SVGt1.2 spec is not > acceptable. Wasn't the design philosophy of SVG the XML one, i.e. you mix namespaces to get non-graphical features. I'm not sure if XFORMS is concrete enough, but otherwise one would use actual HTML forms.
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 07:30:51 UTC