- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:15:03 +0000
- To: SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote: > > which is simple to understand does not provide anything similar to: > html form: action or method, which aywk do not require script. > and it is in this sense that I feel the SVGt1.2 spec is not acceptable. > Wasn't the design philosophy of SVG the XML one, i.e. you mix namespaces to get non-graphical features. I'm not sure if XFORMS is concrete enough, but otherwise one would use actual HTML forms. (This is a second attempt, for www-svg, as I mistyped it first time. Note that the yahoo groups cross post is a closed group and failed. I'm still waiting to see what happens to the webapi one. Cross-posting email is not a good idea.) -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 18:16:08 UTC