W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: [svg-developers] Re: SVGt1.2: Text Box

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:15:03 +0000
Message-ID: <47DEB527.3060007@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>

~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote:
> which is simple to understand does not provide anything similar to:
> html form: action or method, which aywk do not require script.
>  and it is in this sense that I feel the SVGt1.2 spec is not acceptable.

Wasn't the design philosophy of SVG the XML one, i.e. you mix namespaces
to get non-graphical features.  I'm not sure if XFORMS is concrete
enough, but otherwise one would use actual HTML forms.

(This is a second attempt, for www-svg, as I mistyped it first time. 
Note that the yahoo groups cross post is a closed group and failed.  I'm 
still waiting to see what happens to the webapi one.  Cross-posting 
email is not a good idea.)

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 18:16:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:18 UTC