- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:04:05 +0100
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <C8BD05DF-CA1A-494B-A5DA-EB1A6D99D89A@btinternet.com>
Doug, I have already outlined a clear use case. a user who does not want to or is not capable of learning svg, xmlhttprequest, javascript and php, but wishes to embed a symbol for the current weather in their homepage. what is it about this use case that you don't understand? regards Jonathan Chetwynd j.chetwynd@btinternet.com http://www.openicon.org/ +44 (0) 20 7978 1764 On 28 Jul 2008, at 22:40, Doug Schepers wrote: > > Hi, Jonathan- > > Jonathan Chetwynd wrote (on 7/28/08 9:15 AM): >> David, >> copyright is a red-herring, all the images we use are public domain. > > Copyright is relevant to the larger discussion, as not all images > are public domain, even if yours are. We have to solve the general > case in designing a language. > > >> furthermore those people who provide images in feeds, presumably >> understand and intend them for repurposing by 'others'. >> afaik there are no feed readers that display images. >> similar arguments apply to your ethical case. > > Actually, David's post was very helpful in scoping the range of use > cases. > > >> the fact is that our users and many people would benefit from being >> able to simply embed these types of information into their own >> resources. >> hence the development of feeds... > > You may be right, but it's hard to tell without more data. Can you > please outline some concrete use cases and requirements, preferably > citing existing practice, so we can work on the technical aspects of > just what would need to happen to satisfy those use cases? > > Since you are serving as the advocate for what you term "naive > users", and want to get them more involved in setting standards, I > suggest that you engage them directly in finding what they do today, > what they want to be able to do, and what they feel is blocking them > from doing it. It's probably not reasonable to push them on > technical details, so anecdotal examples from their perspective is > probably enough for us to drill into technical solutions. Please > indicate where the use cases are identified by your constituents, > and where you have made inferences and conclusions based on your > observation. > > There's no need to be overly formal in your report (though that may > be useful for you to reuse it for your own purposes), but > thoroughness will help us to produce the best solution. > > Thanks for identifying a possible use case and bringing it to our > attention. If we find that the data merits it, this could form part > of the basis for a module. It may be that we find the use cases can > be adequately solved with other means or other technologies, so your > input won't be wasted even if the SVG WG doesn't end up specifying > anything, since hopefully you will have gotten some solution. > > Regards- > -Doug Schepers > W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF >
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 06:04:48 UTC