- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:48:41 +0100
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Wednesday, January 9, 2008, 12:52:03 PM, Dr. wrote: DOH> If color itself is animated as in animate-elem-85-t it will not be sufficient DOH> to pass the test, if the currentColor is only determined at the beginning DOH> of another animation. It has to be determined any time, the value DOH> is needed, if color is changed somehow. I think, this behaviour can DOH> already be determined from the property name, it is currentColor and DOH> not pastColor or futureColor or something like this. Yes; and the definition seems clear (to me) in the spec: currentColor Indicates that painting shall be done using the color specified by the current animated value of the 'color' property. http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/painting.html#SpecifyingPaint DOH> For example in the bottom subtest of animate-elem-85-t the resulting DOH> color changes in a quadratic dependence, because both fill and color DOH> are animated and currentColor is the to-value for fill. DOH> This is somehow similar to the behaviour of to-animations with DOH> underlying animations, obviously not really easy to implement, but DOH> for any example it is precisely testable, whether this is implemented DOH> correctly or not. And currently, I think it is risky for authors to rely on DOH> such more complex animations unfortunately. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 20:48:47 UTC