- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:23:07 +0200
- To: "Kalle Raita" <kraita@nvidia.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Thursday, October 25, 2007, 9:54:29 AM, Kalle wrote: KR> Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, the behaviour has been changed in SVGt KR> 1.2. We were wondering if it were still possible to amend the SVGt 1.1 KR> conformance tests regarding this case. An official acknowledgement that KR> the case is flawed would help a bit also. We may still have the need to KR> produce implementations that are conformant to 1.1 spec instead of 1.2. We will certainly discuss doing that, I think it makes sense to do so. KR> BTW, I checked the 1.1 errata. It seems to be empty. Where are you looking? From http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/ the link to errata goes to http://www.w3.org/2003/01/REC-SVG11-20030114-errata which is certainly not empty. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 11:23:22 UTC