- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 22:30:26 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: "Andrew Emmons" <aemmons@opentext.com>, www-svg@w3.org
On Wednesday, March 1, 2006, 9:55:51 PM, Bjoern wrote: BH> * Andrew Emmons wrote: >>It has been decided to not change the signature of the gotoLocation >>method since there are commercial implementations and existing content >>that use gotoLocation. BH> Could you point these implementations out? Searching for the name and BH> SVG didn't reveal them to me, unfortunately. Also, could you elaborate BH> on the status of these implementations and how it's possible that they BH> already implement such features, given that W3C didn't call for imple- BH> mentation of SVG Tiny 1.2 yet? You seem to suggest that its impossible to implement before CR. This is not the case. BH> I'm also keen to learn why it seems to BH> matter that these implementations are considered "commercial". >>However, we do feel that adding the ability to reload the current >>document by specifying an empty string is very useful without requiring >>a change to the method's signature. We will update the spec to add this >>feature. BH> I note that this directly contradicts the Working Group's previous BH> resultion and response to the issue I raised regarding this feature. BH> Is this what these commercial implementations do? Where can we find BH> the tests for this? -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2006 21:30:36 UTC