- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:34:29 -0800
- To: Jon Ferraiolo <jonf@adobe.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-svg@w3c.org
On Mar 1, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Jon Ferraiolo wrote: > Also, <textArea> is not a new feature with the 3rd Last Call, so > your comment > is out of the scope of feedback which we have solicited. The 3rd Last > Call was announced with the following words: "The purpose of this > third > Last Call is to allow reviewers to verify that their comments have > been > included as agreed by the SVG Working Group, it is not intended as a > new, general review period." Please address Ian's comment on the substance. The W3C Process says: "Starting with a Last Call review up to the transition to Proposed Recommendation, a Working Group must formally address any substantive review comment about a technical report and should do so in a timely manner." http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#doc-reviews The W3C Process does not appear to allow limiting the scope of a Last Call, or indeed to allow limiting the scope of comments addressed even up to the PR stage. (It does say a working group "the Working Group may decline to make substantive changes to address issues raised between the end of a Last Call review period and publication of a Recommendation" In fact the W3C process does not even allow having another Last Call immediately after a Last Call draft fails to proceed to CR. The W3C Process says: "The Working Group makes substantive changes to the technical report at any time after a Last Call announcement and prior to Publication as a Recommendation, except when the changes involve the removal of features at risk identified in a Call for Implementations. In the case of substantive changes, the Working Group must republish the technical report as a Working Draft." Please follow the W3C Process. Regards, Maciej > > Thanks for your feedback. > > Jon Ferraiolo > SVG WG > > -------------- > > From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> > Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:25:33 +0000 (UTC) > To: www-svg@w3.org > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512281919430.7669@dhalsim.dreamhost.com> > > > I object to the inclusion of the <textArea> feature in SVG Tiny > 1.2. It > appears to be no more than a poor man's HTML, dramatically lacking in > semantics and presentational controls. It is already possible to > achieve > > any effect that <textArea> introduces, using <foreignObject> and > embedded > content styled using CSS' rich formatting properties. > > Please remove the <textArea> feature from SVG Tiny 1.2. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E ) > \._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _ > \ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'-- > (,_..'`-.;.' > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2006 19:34:44 UTC