- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:08:33 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, www-svg@w3.org
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Chris Lilley wrote: >> >> then why does SVG Tiny 1.2 claim to be in accordance with AWWW? > > Because "in accordance with" is a form of words that was carefully > agreed, as a result of prior review, with several parties including > other members of the TAG. It means the design of SVG has been informed > by the architectural principles of the AWWW. It does not equate to > conformance. One cannot comply with it, but one can be informed by it > and design in accordance with it. It's the fact that it was designed in accordance with AWWW that I think is untrue, and it is the inclusion of the assertion that it was that I object to and would like to have clearly marked in the disposition of comments. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2006 22:08:52 UTC