- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:44:43 +1000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Chris. Chris Lilley: > No. Its a supplemental transform, as you point out, so the animated > value of the transform attribute itself does not change. OK thank you for clarifying. There was another question in my original mail: Cameron McCormack: > Perhaps if it doesn't affect the animated transform value it is > because 'animateMotion' can be applied to elements that don't > implement SVGTransformable. In the list of elements that can be > animated with 'animateMotion', only one of them doesn't implement > SVGTransformable: 'mask'. But then, 'mask' doesn't implement > SVGLocatable either, so I'm not sure what it means to animate its > motion when it doesn't have a CTM. Since we’ve established that the animated value of the transform attribute does not change, it is OK for a ‘mask’ element to be animated. I still wonder, though: what does it mean for a ‘mask’ element to be animated with ‘animateMotion’? Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:heycam@jabber.org ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN cam@mcc.id.au
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:45:55 UTC