RE: SVG12: SVGGlobal::document vs AbstractView

Hi, Bjoern-

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
| >Can you state explicitly why you think it should be required?
| To ensure that the proposed SVGGlobal interface is not incompatible
| with a future 'Global' interace. If this 'Global' interface provides
| a 'document' member in the same way as
| proposes, they would not be compatible according to the SVG Working
| Group.
| discusses this problem in detail.

We agree that WebAPI's Window Specification may or may not address the
features that are needed for SVG Tiny 1.2. If a referencable document that
addresses our requirements becomes available during SVG Tiny 1.2's CR phase,
we will reference that document instead.

If this does not satisfy your concern, please respond within 2 weeks with
further clarification.

Doug, on behalf of the SVG WG

Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 19:57:24 UTC