RE: SVG12: <handler>, etc. vs <handler>, etc.

Hi Björn,

> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann

>   From 
> I am concerned that the new SVG-specific features conflict 
> with work the HTML Working Group is chartered to develop as 
> noted in XML Events,
> section 
> 3.5. It would be most unfortunate if these mechanisms turn 
> out to be different or even incompatible such that e.g. a 
> compound XHTML2+SVG document depends on different scripting 
> idioms. Please explicitly request that the HTML and CDF 
> Working Group review this section. An official comment from 
> both Working Groups that the proposed features are consistent 
> with work in progress by the HTML Working Group would 
> probably be satisfactory.

The SVG WG has changed the SVG Tiny 1.2 spec to simply refer to the XML Events recommendation and removed all deviations from that spec.

Please let us know within 2 weeks if this does not satisfy your concern.

Scott Hayman
On behalf of the SVG Working Group

This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:23:32 UTC