RE: [SVGMobile12] SVGT12-207: Too many issues (again)

Hi, Ian-

We have substantially extended the review period. We will make a full draft
available to allow reviewers to see the
disposition of comments in the context of a full draft before proceeding to
another stage.

Thanks!!!

Doug,
on behalf of the SVG WG
 

Ian Hickson wrote:
| 
| I'm afraid that the three weeks that the SVG working group so 
| generously 
| provided to let us proof-read the SVG Tiny 1.2 Last Call were 
| not enough 
| for me to perform a thorough review. I was only able to read 
| about one 
| third of the specification in the time alloted, mostly due to 
| the large 
| number of problems still apparent in the text.
| 
| Please substantially increase the review period so that we 
| may have more 
| time to review this long specification.
| 
| Given the large number of comments, including several that 
| will require 
| substantial rewrites to address, I would like the opportunity 
| to review 
| the changes that will be made, in the context of a complete 
| specification, 
| before this specification moves to the next phase.
| 
| Furthermore, given the number of issues that failed to be addressed 
| correctly during the last review period, I would also like to 
| have the 
| opportunity to re-review the changes that were made in response to 
| comments sent in the last review period, once they have actually been 
| made correctly.
| 
| Please therefore publish at least one more Working Draft of 
| SVG Tiny 1.2, 
| and give us an opportunity to perform another thorough review, before 
| progressing to the next stage in the Recommendation Track.
| 
| -- 
| Ian Hickson               U+1047E                
| )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
| http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   
| _\  ;`._ ,.
| Things that are impossible just take longer.   
| `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
|

Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 05:29:30 UTC