- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:26:39 -0000
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, <www-svg@w3.org>
"Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Jim Ley wrote: >> >> Certainly, however I fail to see the dis-advantage in having to have >> attributeX in the new version if you want to extend the semantics > > So you're saying you _do_ want well-defined error handling, but for only > one case, namely unknown attributes? And you want that those "MUST be > ignored"? No, I want it left open to the user agent. I don't see how the above is confusing - the issue of extending the semantics in later versions is orthogonal to handling invalid content. Jim.
Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 10:27:05 UTC