- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:15:02 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, www-svg@w3.org
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Jim Ley wrote: > > Certainly, however I fail to see the dis-advantage in having to have > attributeX in the new version if you want to extend the semantics So you're saying you _do_ want well-defined error handling, but for only one case, namely unknown attributes? And you want that those "MUST be ignored"? Why would you want error handling for errors on the left hand side of the equals sign but not the right hand side? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 21:15:30 UTC