- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:13:35 +0100
- To: Andreas Neumann <neumann@karto.baug.ethz.ch>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, www-svg@w3c.org
Quoting Andreas Neumann <neumann@karto.baug.ethz.ch>: > There is also this chicken and egg problem that many implementors > don't start implementing a spec until it is in CR and on the other > hand the WG is dependent on specific feedback by implementors. > Implementors will certainly find mistakes and problems while > implementing the spec that the spec creators and people only reading > the spec won't easily find. As SVG Tiny 1.2 has a lot of features from SVG 1.1 and implementors are implementating that and also following new developments for clarifications (regarding error handling etc.) I don't think that's really the issue here. I agree with Maciej that moving to CR from the current draft is probably not the right thing to do given the many oustanding issues and given the amount of issues that have not been properly addressed when moving from LC2 to LC3. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:13:43 UTC