- From: Dean Jackson <dino@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:09:18 +1100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On 04/01/2006, at 7:41 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Dean Jackson wrote: >>> We have many times suggested a simple solution: >>> >>> * Continue to have the "px" unit in text/css be exactly >>> equivalent to >>> unit-free "user units" in SVG. >>> >>> * If other units are used, convert them to "px" units (and thus >>> user >>> units) in exactly the same way that CSS already requires. >>> >>> This is what the specs *already say*. This is scalable. It is >>> completely compatible with all existing specs and content. >> >> I agree with this solution. (I actually thought we'd already >> decided to) > > As Ian points out, this is what the specifications already say. The > solution would include > >>> Then: >>> >>> * Remove the requirement that SVG places on CSS parsers to accept >>> <length>s that are just <number>s. > > Do you agree with this aswell? Yeah. Sorry I responded at the wrong place. If we can have a solution where authors get to use stroke-width="4" in XML content and are required to use "{stroke-width: 4px}" in stylesheets, then I'm happy. I would be happier if CSS hadn't required units on <length>s, but I have a sneaking suspicion that that won't change. [of course I mean requiring units in CSS stylesheets, not that all objects must be stroked with four pixels :] BTW - I'm not speaking for the SVG WG here. Dean
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2006 03:09:36 UTC