- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:44:29 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Chris Lilley wrote:
>BH> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/refs.html is a mess,
>BH> there is basically no point in reviewing it. There are many references
>BH> which are never referred to in the draft, several references are out-
>BH> dated, work in progress is not cited as work in progress,
>
>Point taken, and all now corrected.
It's better now, but there are still some incorrect entries, for example
http://www.opengis.org/techno/specs/01-014r3.pdf does not correspond to
the entry in the draft.
>BH> and it is not
>BH> even close to http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#References be consistent
>BH> to W3C's manual of style.
>
>While noting that the manual of style is suggested rather than required,
>("No requirements for W3C publications are in this document.") we took
>the opportunity to change the markup to conform to
>http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#ref-section as well.
Well, it doesn't really, does it?
The document now makes incorrect use of the text/html media type, please
change the draft to comply with http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2006 23:44:10 UTC