- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:17:13 -0500
- To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- CC: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Robin Berjon wrote: > As someone who's been in the trenches of mobile > SVG usage in the past few years, I can tell you it's not a happy state > of affairs. Robin, thank you for the very clear explanation of the current situation. I guess the upshot is that the HTML browser vendors do not in fact feel some of the time and competitive pressures that you describe, and the result is still that SVG Tiny 1.2 is the wrong process for them to participate in -- it's targeted at a completely different audience with completely different needs, desires, and economic realities. Unfortunately, SVG Full 1.2 is planned to be based on SVG Tiny 1.2, and various issues unresolved in SVG Tiny 1.2 due to the time constraints will have to be grandfathered into SVG Full 1.2. The combination of all of which leads to the current unhappiness. -Boris
Received on Monday, 14 August 2006 15:17:27 UTC