- From: Alex Menzies <amenzie@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:56:34 -0500
- To: "Kevin Lindsey" <kevin@kevlindev.com>
- Cc: "'Andreas Neumann'" <neumann@karto.baug.ethz.ch>, www-svg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF0631E5B3.A3FE931D-ON872571CA.0051DD4B-862571CA.00521579@us.ibm.com>
Sounds like a good idea to me. -Alex "Kevin Lindsey" <kevin@kevlindev.com> 08/11/2006 06:34 PM To "'Andreas Neumann'" <neumann@karto.baug.ethz.ch>, Alex Menzies/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, <www-svg@w3.org> cc Subject RE: Question about getPointAtLength Hey Andreas, I realize your email wasn't directed to me; however, since I originally posted on this topic (about a year ago), I like to throw in my two cents and say that I'm happy with your proposed solution. -Kevin -----Original Message----- From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Neumann Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 2:15 PM To: Alex Menzies; www-svg@w3.org Subject: Re: Question about getPointAtLength Hello Alex, Please apologize our late reply on this question. We discussed this issue recently and propose to return path.getPointAtLength(0) for negative values and path.getPointAtLength(path.getTotalLength()) for values that are bigger than the total path length. It is proposed that "out of range" values don't result in error reporting. One of the reasoning is that sometimes there might be accuracy issues with path length calculations from potentially different sources or algorithms. We will provide an errata for SVG 1.1 Full and include it in SVG 1.2 Full. Does that sound reasonable from an implementers point of view? Andreas Alex Menzies wrote: > > Hi, > I would like inquire about the desired behavior of the > getPointAtLength method when called with a distance parameter that is > out of range. My question is the same as the one asked in the > following email by Kevin Lindsey: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2003Aug/0005 > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2003Aug/0005> > > Could you please provide some clarification on this matter and either > post the information in an errata to the 1.1 specification or include > it in the 1.2 version. > > Thanks! > -Alex -- ---------------------------------------------- Andreas Neumann Institute of Cartography ETH Zurich Wolfgang-Paulistrasse 15 CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland Phone: ++41-44-633 3031, Fax: ++41-44-633 1153 e-mail: neumann@karto.baug.ethz.ch www: http://www.carto.net/neumann/ SVG.Open: http://www.svgopen.org/ Carto.net: http://www.carto.net/
Received on Monday, 14 August 2006 14:56:51 UTC