- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:50:49 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Friday, April 21, 2006, 10:45:49 PM, Bjoern wrote: BH> * Chris Lilley wrote: >>["An animation element may be defined as cumulative >>only if addition is defined for the target attribute."] >>BH> It does *not* say >>BH> An animation element MAY be defined as cumulative if >>BH> addition is defined for the target attribute. >>It does not say that, but you may also infer that from what it does say. BH> In the interest of clarity, you are saying that from BH> An animation element may be defined as cumulative only BH> if addition is defined for the target attribute. BH> one may infer BH> An animation element may be defined as cumulative BH> if addition is defined for the target attribute. BH> is that correct? That is a necessary but not sufficient condition, yes. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 20:50:49 UTC