- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:00:15 +0200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Chris Lilley wrote: >BH> In the interest of clarity, you are saying that from > >BH> An animation element may be defined as cumulative only >BH> if addition is defined for the target attribute. > >BH> one may infer > >BH> An animation element may be defined as cumulative >BH> if addition is defined for the target attribute. > >BH> is that correct? > >That is a necessary but not sufficient condition, yes. Good you carefully avoided directly answering my question. Very well, I've already registered my formal objection, it's of no use to con- tinue this discussion. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 22:00:20 UTC