- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:45:49 +0200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Chris Lilley wrote: >["An animation element may be defined as cumulative >only if addition is defined for the target attribute."] > >BH> It does *not* say > >BH> An animation element MAY be defined as cumulative if >BH> addition is defined for the target attribute. > >It does not say that, but you may also infer that from what it does say. In the interest of clarity, you are saying that from An animation element may be defined as cumulative only if addition is defined for the target attribute. one may infer An animation element may be defined as cumulative if addition is defined for the target attribute. is that correct? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 20:46:01 UTC