- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:26:01 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, www-svg@w3.org
On Sunday, May 22, 2005, 1:11:43 AM, Bjoern wrote: BH> SMIL Animation is also sufficiently normative and maintained BH> to reference it from other sections of the draft, so I stand by my BH> original request. SMIL Animation is not particularly maintained. In response to comments (including yours) we refer only to SMIL 2.0 now, which does not have these interfaces. BH> In SVG 1.1 and SMIL Animation the TimeEvent is BH> org.w3c.dom.smil.TimeEvent, so putting it into the events module BH> would mean one of BH> * redundant interfaces (both .smil.TimeEvent and .events.TimeEvent) Yes, that is what it does mean. An implementation that supports both 1.1 and 1.2 has to allow both methods (but only needs to implement it once, clearly). Please let us know within two weeks if that does not satisfy you. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 11:26:20 UTC