- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:26:57 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Quoting Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>: >> And what to do for UAs who are build upon namespace dispatching? (And have >> bindings for elements in a particular namespace which then results in >> rendering.) > > If you use namespace dispatching the rect element goes to the SVG > implementation. Since it is not a conforming SVG fragment it is not > rendered. This is already specified in the existing conformance and > implementation requirement sections, and SVG Tiny 1.2 clarifies it > even further. This is not specified. F.2. specifies "in error". You would think the fourth point, "Other situations that are described as being in error in this specification", would apply, but G.4. does not talk about "in error". Anyway, it seems that the intent is that nothing should be displayed as svg:rect is part of SVG, but it is not conforming as it is not inside SVG context and should therefore not be rendered at all. (As if it had 'display:none'.) Is that what SVG Tiny 1.2 says and what the consensus is of the SVG WG? (I'm just trying to find out what we should implement.) Kind regards, Anne van Kesteren -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 11:26:59 UTC