- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:22:08 -0600
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Cameron McCormack wrote: > For bindings such as ECMAScript, where there is no notion of interfaces > per se and objects just happen to adhere a particular interface, it > doesn't matter so much. Indeed, except insofar as in a COM-like system (such as Mozilla, for example) it violates COM rules. > I'm interested to know if in the C++ parts of > Mozilla you have references to XBL objects where this becomes a problem. Yes, there can definitely be references from C++ to XBL objects in Mozilla. And yes, behavior when bindings are removed is a pretty major issue there... > But at least DOM3 says that the node is allowed to be replaced if it is > not possible for the implementation to just rename the node (for > whatever reason). Indeed. I fully expect to take advantage of that weasel-hole as needed. ;) -Boris
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2005 04:22:10 UTC