- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jon.ferraiolo@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:11:44 -0800
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
At 04:16 PM 3/23/2005, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >* Jon Ferraiolo wrote: > >But I would expect that the most common scenario will be that XBL widget > >libraries will define widgets which expose methods and DOM attributes. (And > >generate events.) If that is indeed the case, then saying "widgets which > >expose interfaces cannot be bound with CSS" is not a good approach -- it > >wouldn't be worth the effort. Just extend the sXBL matching which is based > >on QName to an XPath expression which is evaluated at the time the custom > >element is added to the document. If the XPath expression matches, then > >turn the custom element's identity into what the binding defines. > >So @element should be renamed to something less restrictive like @match? Sounds like a good suggestion to me. I will forward this suggestion to the XBL task force. Jon >-- >Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de >Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de >68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2005 03:12:48 UTC