Re: This might be a stupid question...

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Dean Jackson wrote:
>> My thinking is that it is error. This is the same
>> as a script adding an element that doesn't exist, or
>> as a child of an element that can't contain it, or
>> doing something else that is equally bad.
> Does this mean that parsers should be validating parsers?

No, but it does meant that implementations need to understand the 
semantics of what they're implementing. It doesn't seem like too much to 
ask either.

Robin Berjon
   Research Scientist

Received on Monday, 17 January 2005 10:47:58 UTC