- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:27:21 +0000 (UTC)
- To: www-svg@w3.org
I'm afraid that the three weeks that the SVG working group so generously provided to let us proof-read the SVG Tiny 1.2 Last Call were not enough for me to perform a thorough review. I was only able to read about one third of the specification in the time alloted, mostly due to the large number of problems still apparent in the text. Please substantially increase the review period so that we may have more time to review this long specification. Given the large number of comments, including several that will require substantial rewrites to address, I would like the opportunity to review the changes that will be made, in the context of a complete specification, before this specification moves to the next phase. Furthermore, given the number of issues that failed to be addressed correctly during the last review period, I would also like to have the opportunity to re-review the changes that were made in response to comments sent in the last review period, once they have actually been made correctly. Please therefore publish at least one more Working Draft of SVG Tiny 1.2, and give us an opportunity to perform another thorough review, before progressing to the next stage in the Recommendation Track. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 00:27:36 UTC