- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:20:57 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Chris Lilley wrote: >> More generally, it is not clear when requiredFeatures for a given string >> would return true; that some attributes have feature strings seems to >> imply that it might be possible for an implementation to return true for >> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/feature/1.2/#Shape even though it does >> not support http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/feature/1.2/#PaintAttribute >> it is however not clear whether this is the case. > >"indicates that the viewer can process and render successfully all of the >corresponding language features" seems fairly clear. That language applies only to SVG-static, SVG-animated, and SVG-all. Even if it applied to all feature strings, it's not clear what "all of the corresponding language features" refers to. >It would be hard to render shapes without painting them. The PaintAttribute feature string does not correspond to "the viewer can paint shapes" but "the viewer supports the Paint Attribute Module". The draft does not say anywhere whether an implementation can support Shape even though it fills all shapes with black, for example. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 28 December 2005 16:21:14 UTC