- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:11:54 +0100
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3c.org
On Sunday, December 11, 2005, 8:01:18 AM, Maciej wrote: MS> I think it would really improve the spec to have a section that MS> indicates changes relative to SVG 1.1. This would be a great help MS> both to implementors and to anyone looking to comment on the spec. MS> Currently many major web browsers are implementing SVG 1.1 Full MS> directly (Firefox, Opera and Mozilla all have work in various stages MS> of progress). It would be really nice if it were possible to MS> implement an engine that supports the union of 1.1 Full and 1.2 Tiny MS> without a mode switch, but it's hard to tell from the spec if this is MS> feasible. I suspect browsers would not want to implement 1.2 Full as MS> it currently stands. Its hard to produce a diff between 1.1 full and 1.2 tiny given the markup is different and that the wording has been altered in some places to make it clearer. The old (profile) 1.2 spec had color coding for elements in 1.2 tiny that were not in 1.1 tiny. We could look at doing element and attribute indexes that were similarly coded (new compared to Tiny 1.1, and new compared to Full 1.1) -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 08:12:00 UTC