Re: Last Call: SVG Tiny 1.2

Hi Chris,

    Can you please update your summary of  SVGT12-164 (Comments on
textArea vs flowText) to reflect my response at:

        http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Nov/0162.html

   In particular I object to it being classified as 'No change was 
requested'
please change this to  'disagreed', a response to my comments might
also be nice.

www-svg-request@w3.org wrote on 12/07/2005 06:53:34 PM:

> 
> Hello www-svg,
> 
> I am pleased to announce the (third) Last call  for SVG Tiny 1.2. This
> was requested by several reviewers from the second last call, so that
> they could see the resolution of their comments in context.
> 
> The disposition of comments from the second last call is available at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/lc-replies.html
> 
>    1. Document title
>    Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Tiny 1.2 Specification
> 
>    2. Document URI
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/
>    also available as a non-normative PDF
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/SVGMobile12.pdf
> 
>    3. Review start and end dates
>    Starting 7 December 2005
>    Ending 28 December 2005
> 
>    4. A reference to the group's decision to advance.
>    Minutes of the SVG WG Teleconference, 29 Nov 2005
> 
>    5. Evidence that the document satisfies group's requirements.
>       Include a link to requirements (e.g., in the charter or
>       requirements documents).
>    Charter: http://www.w3.org/2004/10/svg-charter.html
>    Requirements: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-SVGTiny12Reqs-20031209/
> 
>    6. The names of groups with dependencies, explicitly inviting
>    review from them.
> 
>    The SVG developer community is invited to review this document.
> 
>    The OMA is invited to review this document.
> 
>    The 3GPP SA4 is invited to review this document.
> 
>    The following W3C WGs who sent in comments on the second last call
>    are invited to review this document. Links are to the disposition of
>    your previous comments:
> 
>    QA WG
> 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/lc-replies.html#SVGT12-184
>    see also
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/qa-ics.html
> 
>    CSS WG
> 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/lc-replies.html#SVGT12-234
> 
>    WAI P&F
> 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/lc-replies.html#SVGT12-237
>    see also
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/access.html
> 
>    The W3C XML Schema WG is particularly invited to review the RelaxNG
>    schema: we were unable to express the same semantics in XSD and would
>    appreciate expert guidance.
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/schema.html
>    also please see the use of NVDL here
> 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/conform.html#ConformingSVGContent
> 
> 
>    7. Report of any objections
>    There were no objections recorded in the Working Group.
>    Four objections to the second last call are recorded (in red) here
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/lc-replies.html
>    The commentors are invited to review the third last call and let us
>    know if their objections still stand.
> 
>    8. A link to a patent disclosure page
>    http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Disclosures
> 
> -- 
>  Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
>  Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
>  W3C Graphics Activity Lead
>  Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 8 December 2005 12:02:17 UTC