W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2004

RE: SVG 1.2 tiny

From: James Bentley <James.Bentley@guideworkstv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:02:17 -0600
Message-ID: <687B7858C99ED711B87B00B0D0D1C922C0FD31@LAMBIC>
To: 'Robin Berjon' <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org

GZip is required by Tiny?
This has 2 negatives. 1, you must unzip to memory - Gzip is not stream
2, compression and decompression take CPU cycles away from devices that have
hard time just doing the animations.

I like the binary XML.

-----Original Message-----
From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
Robin Berjon
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:51 AM
To: James Bentley
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Subject: Re: SVG 1.2 tiny

James Bentley wrote:
> On another note. Should SVG tiny require that attribute values be enclosed
> in double-quotes?
> Several bytes can be saved per page if Tiny supports attribute value
> specification with and
> w/o quotes. Quotes should only be necessary where the value contains
> whitespace or
> other delimeters.

As has been said, that's just not an option (though you can use single 
quotes instead of double if you want).

That kind of size saving doesn't normally buy you much. Gzip, which is 
required from all SVG implementations, will reduce the size anyway. If 
you need more than what gzip buys you, you can switch to binary XML.

Robin Berjon
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 16:06:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:03 UTC