- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:43:40 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Craig Northway wrote: >> >> I was not involved in the vote (assuming there even was one), as I am >> not a member of the SVG working group per se. > > There was a vote as per the official W3C process. It is noted in the > minutes of October 21st. I don't think that suggesting there wasn't a > vote is suitable. Oh, I didn't mean it in any sort of offensive way -- it's quite common for groups not to have a formal vote for this kind of thing. For example for CSS 2.1 the decision to go to last call was something along the lines of a unanimous spontaneous cheer at the end of a face to face, not a vote. > I find it difficult to believe someone could be subscribed to the SVG > member confidential mailing list and not notice that SVG 1.2 Full was > nearing last call. I'm not subscribed to the SVG member confidential mailing list. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 16:43:42 UTC