- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:51:44 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Craig Northway wrote: >>There was a vote as per the official W3C process. It is noted in the >>minutes of October 21st. I don't think that suggesting there wasn't a >>vote is suitable. > > Oh, I didn't mean it in any sort of offensive way -- it's quite common for > groups not to have a formal vote for this kind of thing. For example for > CSS 2.1 the decision to go to last call was something along the lines of a > unanimous spontaneous cheer at the end of a face to face, not a vote. FWIW we didn't have a formal vote, just a strawpoll. I'm not sure exactly why, I think it was basically to make sure that no one's objection had been drowned in the festive cheering, popping of champagne bottles, and victorious cries that <flowRoot> was going to replace XHTML and CSS for good, muahahah. Oh, wait. Maybe that was meant to remain member-confidential. Let's get back to the rest of the comments :) -- Robin Berjon
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 16:52:16 UTC