- From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:24:17 +1100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Hi, Ian Hickson wrote: >On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Craig Northway wrote: > > >>>I was not involved in the vote (assuming there even was one), as I am >>>not a member of the SVG working group per se. >>> >>> >>There was a vote as per the official W3C process. It is noted in the >>minutes of October 21st. I don't think that suggesting there wasn't a >>vote is suitable. >> >> > >Oh, I didn't mean it in any sort of offensive way -- it's quite common for >groups not to have a formal vote for this kind of thing. For example for >CSS 2.1 the decision to go to last call was something along the lines of a >unanimous spontaneous cheer at the end of a face to face, not a vote. > > Sorry, its always difficult to gather intent from emails. > > > >>I find it difficult to believe someone could be subscribed to the SVG >>member confidential mailing list and not notice that SVG 1.2 Full was >>nearing last call. >> >> > >I'm not subscribed to the SVG member confidential mailing list. > > I'd noticed that you have posted to it so assumed that you were subscribed. Craig
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 21:24:50 UTC