- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:44:12 +0100
- To: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Tobias Reif wrote: >>>The freedom to add foreign content "anywhere" would also have to be >>>expressed in the schemas. >> >>Yes. > > I hope the 1.1 RNG will be updated soon and maintained actively until > it's complete and correct, but you already knew that :) Yup! >>We have been considering using NRL to help with that. > > For allowing arbitrary foreign content RNG suffices, but NRL might be > more convenient for you [2]. If people need to validate that foreign > content then NRL helps, but you (the SVG WG) can't really help with > that AFAICS, since content from any foreign namespace is allowed. I > assume you refer to using NRL for stuff like XLink and XSLT which is > respectively will be referenced from the specs? I know, which is why XLink is included directly and not through NRL (likewise XML Events). I'd estimate it's most likely to concern XForms and XHTML (and of course user-defined languages). The RNG should normally end up being open throughout. I wish there were a way to make that the default ;) -- Robin Berjon
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 14:44:14 UTC