Re: [SVG 1.2] Other notes.

Jim Ley wrote:
> "Robin Berjon" <> wrote in message
>>SVG user
>>agents need not support that copyright information, the simple fact of
>>stating it is legally binding for whom may want to copy content, which
>>is why it's recommended to use it (as some people seem to require that).
> Sure, but we can already include that metadata in current SVG, and a
> copyright element seems useful, but suggesting RDF is just too much effort,
> why not just:
> <copyright>  Some message to be displayed when viewing source...
> </copyright>
> Is much simpler to implement and achieves the same as the RDF, we can still
> encourage authors to include the RDF version, but...

What part of pasting some RDF in there represents too much effort? The 
UA needs do not nothing about it, the author can just grab it off 
Creative Commons and copy it into her document.

Robin Berjon

Received on Monday, 24 November 2003 12:27:46 UTC