- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:12:39 -0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@expway.fr> wrote in message news:3FB68A43.4090003@expway.fr... > > 16.2 Copyright info > > I love the ways in which you manage to be brilliantly silly ;) oohh, first time I've heard that word used in a sentance describing me... > SVG user > agents need not support that copyright information, the simple fact of > stating it is legally binding for whom may want to copy content, which > is why it's recommended to use it (as some people seem to require that). Sure, but we can already include that metadata in current SVG, and a copyright element seems useful, but suggesting RDF is just too much effort, why not just: <copyright> Some message to be displayed when viewing source... </copyright> Is much simpler to implement and achieves the same as the RDF, we can still encourage authors to include the RDF version, but... Jim.
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 13:20:23 UTC