- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:26:15 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org, www-svg-request@w3.org, Steve Schafer <steve@fenestra.com>
On Sunday, May 18, 2003, 4:13:40 AM, Steve wrote: SS> Oh, I understand that. The reason for my post is that the current SVG SS> spec uses the symbol SS> <uri> SS> in two different ways. In other words, you can't have a single grammar SS> that describes a <uri>, because there are actually two different things SS> that the spec calls <uri>. Yes. I understood that, but was seeing how many symbols it had to be split into. I counted two but wondered if there were others. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2003 11:26:41 UTC