- From: Steve Schafer <steve@fenestra.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 22:13:40 -0400
- To: www-svg@w3.org
On Sat, 17 May 2003 10:14:33 +0200, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >All CSS properties are also available as xml presentational >attributes, with identical syntax. > >Thus, all presentational attributes use the CSS url() syntax. Oh, I understand that. The reason for my post is that the current SVG spec uses the symbol <uri> in two different ways. In other words, you can't have a single grammar that describes a <uri>, because there are actually two different things that the spec calls <uri>. I think it would be better if the spec used distinct symbols to represent the two different interpretations. Steve Schafer Fenestra Technologies Corp http://www.fenestra.com/
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2003 22:13:54 UTC