- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:56:02 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Chris Lilley wrote: > Skipping down the [deleted] no offense intended; I read all of it > parts of my email you will se it becomes > more specific about what undated means - in the filename. Now I understand; thanks for the clarification. Just to explain where I got confused: Here "TR> I listed both TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd TR> and TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd TR> and both seem to have been changed. No, just the undated one." you seemed to say that http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd has not been changed (although they both are undated), but further down "TR> ... and TR> 2. those have been changed/fixed: TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd Yes." you said it has been changed. (correct since it's filename doesn't have a date) > svg10.dtd is an undated DTD. svg-yyyymmdd.dtd is a dated DTD. > > Yes, there are dates in the paths as well - not my choice. I see; that's where the misunderstanding came from. Now it all makes sense. Thanks again. Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 10:57:48 UTC