Re: has the SVG 1.0 DTD been edited? (xmlns:xlink on element svg)

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, 4:20:28 PM, Tobias wrote:

TR> Chris Lilley wrote:


>> TR> I listed both
>> TR>   http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd
>> TR> and
>> TR>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd
>> TR> and both seem to have been changed.
>> 
>> No, just the undated one.


TR> I get

TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/DTD/svg10.dtd
TR> <!ATTLIST svg
TR>    xmlns CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
TR>    xmlns:xlink CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"

TR> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd
TR> <!ATTLIST svg
TR>    xmlns CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
TR>    xmlns:xlink CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"

Skipping down the [deleted] parts of my email you will se it becomes
more specific about what undated means - in the filename.

svg10.dtd is an undated DTD. svg-yyyymmdd.dtd is a dated DTD.

Yes, there are dates in the paths as well - not my choice.


-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org

Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 10:40:44 UTC