- From: Chris Meyer <lists@lqgraphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 22:27:32 -0800
- To: www-svg@w3.org
We're considering using SVG as the file format for a image compositing application. Many of the necessary functionality is already there in SVG. But SVG is missing the ability to describe other image processing functions such as a median filter, more specific blur filters, image rendering hints other than 'optimizeSpeed', and 'optimizeQuality', and other core image processing functions (think of the functionality of PhotoShop that might be described in a language such as SVG). Is SVG a good candidate file format for image compositing? Would these types of extensions be best implemented as 'foreignObject' elements, as extensions to SVG itself (feMedian element, for example), or as something else? Or is there a good reason SVG shouldn't be taken in this direction? Or perhaps there is another standard out there doing a similar thing for imaging operations... Any comments, suggestions, or help would be appreciated.
Received on Friday, 31 January 2003 01:42:49 UTC