- From: Vadim Plessky <plessky@cnt.ru>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:10:59 +0300
- To: www-svg@w3.org
On Thursday 21 November 2002 11:58 pm, Tobias Reif wrote: | Vadim Plessky wrote: | > On Thursday 21 November 2002 3:28 pm, Tobias Reif wrote: | > | Vadim Plessky wrote: | > | > | > We | > | > | > do not smooth curves before rendering. | > | > | | > | > | I'm much more interested in a solution than in an explanation | > | > | :) | > | > | > | > You want good rendering for text? | > | > Than pick up latest FreeType release (2.1.3) | > | | > | No, I don't just want a good viewer. I want consistent, best | > | identical rendering *across* implementations. I expressed above that I | > | think the spec needs to be clearer. | > | > Than talk to Adobe to switch their ASV from closed-source implementation | > to FreeType. | > And ask Batik guys to use FreeType, too. | | How would that affect the spec? I guess *you* were speaking about rendering quality, no? And it was your proposal to add some changes to specs, defining rendering quality? | > If there are some other SVG renderers out there which you consider | > importnat and which do not use FreeType yet - ask them to use/support | > FreeType, too. So, you would get identical rendering across | > platforms/renderers. :-) | | No, I would not be able to request it from any viewer. That's a pity. :-) | | Tobi -- Best Regards, Vadim Plessky SVG Icons http://svgicons.sourceforge.net
Received on Friday, 22 November 2002 11:12:57 UTC