- From: Niklas Gustavsson <niklas@protocol7.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:45:20 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
> My feeling today is that SVGP > should be as close to "Static SVG Basic" as possible. Yes! I want this badly. One of the common uses I have in my day-time job is to produce static images (.gif, .png) automatically. Formally you would use something like ASPImage or Java2D, but nowadays rasterizing SVG is a much more attractive way of doing this. And here have dynamic and animated SVG images just makes things much more complex. A static profile would be much needed. I think SVG Static might be a better name then SVG Printing since the profile sure will be used for much more then printing. /niklas www.protocol7.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 04:52:02 UTC