- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:20:07 -0800
- To: w3c-css-wg <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, <www-svg@w3.org>
Forwarding to CSS-WG. I am willing to move forward with this in accordance with the resolutions presented below. Tantek On 11/13/02 12:08 AM, "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org> wrote: > Hello Tantek, www-svg, > > In this message, > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2002May/0067.html > > you wrote (replying to 'fantasai'): > >>> The X11 color set can remain an SVG CSS extension; >> >> Unfortunately, that doesn't make any sense, since there is nothing >> special "SVG"-like about the X11 color set. >> >>> I don't see any reason why it must become part of CSS3:color. >> >> How about the fact that it is already in a REC as noted and >> interoperably implemented cross-browser and cross-platform in >> numerous implementations for many years? Certainly much more than >> can be said about most other technologies in W3C proposals. > > > This topic was recently re-discussed in the SVG WG. We resolved: > > a) we do wish to reference the CSS3 color module from SVG, once it is > at an appropriate level of maturity. > > b) we not wish to deprecate the X11 colors which, as you note, are > widely and consistently used in both SVG and non-SVG contexts. > > c) we recognise that particular profiles may wish to exclude this > group of colors. For example, SVG Mobile excludes them. > > Thus, to ensure that we can reference CSS3 color, we call on the CSS > WG to not deprecate the X11 colors but to include them in the CSS3 > color module and allow particular profiles to include them or not > include them as they see fit. > > You wrote > >> [...] but I will not deprecate them in CSS3 unless >> the SVG working group also deprecates in SVG 1.1. > > It seems then that we are in agreement. >
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2002 14:06:54 UTC