- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 13:50:19 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Masayasu Ishikawa, Thank you very much for the great list. > Xerces-J is not so fast compared to Xerces-C, but it's reportedly > one of the best validating XML processor in terms conformance. I'll check it out. > An old but still useful report on "Conformance > Testing for XML Processors" is at: > > http://www.xml.com/pub/a/1999/09/conformance/ Thanks. Are there any up to date test suite result tables, comparing major parsers? For example in the style of http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/BE-ImpStatus.html (for example from the OASIS test suite) Would you say Xerces-C is fairly complete and conformat? Does it support complex modular DTDs well (XHTML1.1, DocBook)? How exactly do/would you run it from the commandline to validate a document foo.xml?(on Windows) Tobi -- * peace&love. * http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Saturday, 23 March 2002 07:50:45 UTC