- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:25:04 +0100
- To: <www-svg@w3.org>
"Dave Hodder" <dmh@dmh.org.uk> > Security considerations: > (The same as application/xml.) Given that conformant dynamic SVG applications must implement ECMAScript that being the same is not IMO sufficient. > I'd be interested to know whether the W3C has any intention of > submitting an Internet-Draft for this media type in the near future; I'd be interested to know why the WG has not already submitted one, we're stuck in a situation where on pragmatic grounds we have little choice but to have image/svg+xml if we're not going to break existing implementations. The SVG Working groups ease of inventing mime-types is something to worry about. Jim.
Received on Monday, 17 June 2002 18:25:12 UTC