W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2019

Re: 3 tiny issues with CSS Writing Modes 3 (20190903 version)

From: Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 14:24:07 +0800
Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E5836FA9-C3E6-42D3-A10C-F55DF5D34307@w3.org>
To: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
Hi Gérard,

Since the CR has been published, could you file it as a (or several) GitHub issue(s), so that we can fix them before the next publication?

Thanks,

Fuqiao

> On Sep 2, 2019, at 21:29, Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org> wrote:
> 
>> The CSS Working Group would like to publish the CR of CSS Writing Modes 3.
>> The document is available as:
> 
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20190903/
> 
> 3 tiny issues.
> 
> 1-
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20190903/images/orthogonal.svg
> used in Example 11 of section 7.3 Orthogonal Flows
> 
> "extent" and "measure" are not defined anywhere; these are remainings of older versions.
> "measure" should be replaced by "inline size".
> "extent" should be replaced by "block size".
> 
> 2-
> In an ideal version of the spec, colors of arrows would be consistent across sections and reused in all examples.
> So, blue would be for glyph orientation (pointing toward ascender side or "top" side of a line box),
> orange for inline flow and green for block flow.
> 
> 3-
> In
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20190903/#fig-text-orientation
> in section 5.1 after definition of sideways:
> the images are horizontally offset a bit from their terms. If I toggle off
> .figure img {display: block;}
> then the images are correctly aligned with their terms.
> 
> Gérard
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2019 06:24:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 3 September 2019 06:24:22 UTC